(1) I first recognized this article as being scholarly first by noting that it came from the Texas A&M University database.
(2) Then the article noted that the author was a Master of Education Instructor.
(3) I noticed that the article had a more serious, polished look with no pictures. And it also included an abstract.
(4) It also contained references to other sources at the end of the article.
(5) The language was very professional and the article contained technical terms.
(6) It was evident that the article was intended for academic or research communities with a purpose to share what the author researched.
Summary of the Article:
In this article
Styron presents a researched-based discussion of the advantages and
disadvantages of “teaching to the test.” The article explores the concept of “teaching to the
test” initially, and compares this current testing system to the old testing
system used in the past. She concludes with agreeing with the recommendation of
using specific procedures for deterring teachers from “teaching to the test.”
The article does a good job with providing the disadvantages of “teaching to
the test,” which also explain how this teaching method prevents teachers from
adequately preparing their students for future grade levels and college. The author does a good job of conveying a rhetorical message by establishing ethos, or credibility through its scholarly research.
That sounds like an interesting topic. I have several relatives who are teachers who all have different opinions on standardized testing and how to teach accordingly.
ReplyDelete